### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR solve the problems metioned in the
pr(https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/pull/7140) which is also
submitted by me
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Documentation Update
- [ ] Refactoring
- [ ] Performance Improvement
- [ ] Other (please describe):
### Introduction
I fixed the problems when using OpenSearch as the DOC_ENGINE, the
failures of pytest and the wrong API's return.
Mainly about delete chunk, list chunks, update chunk, retrieval chunk.
The pytest comand "cd sdk/python && uv sync --python 3.10 --group test
--frozen && source .venv/bin/activate && cd test/test_http_api &&
DOC_ENGINE=opensearch pytest test_chunk_management_within_dataset -s
--tb=short " is finally successful.
###Others
As some changes between Elasticsearch And Opensearch differ, some pytest
results about OpenSearch are correct and resonable. However, some pytest
params (skipif params) are incompatible. So I changed some pytest params
about skipif.
As a search engine programmer, I will still focus on the usage of vector
databases (especially OpenSearch) for the RAG stuff.
Thanks for your review
### What problem does this PR solve?
change default models to buildin models
https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/issues/7774
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR introduces Pydantic-based validation for the list datasets HTTP
API, improving code clarity and robustness. Key changes include:
Pydantic Validation
Error Handling
Test Updates
Documentation Updates
### Type of change
- [x] Documentation Update
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR introduces Pydantic-based validation for the delete dataset HTTP
API, improving code clarity and robustness. Key changes include:
1. Pydantic Validation
2. Error Handling
3. Test Updates
4. Documentation Updates
### Type of change
- [x] Documentation Update
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fix HTTP API Create/Update dataset parser config default value error
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR introduces Pydantic-based validation for the update dataset HTTP
API, improving code clarity and robustness. Key changes include:
1. Pydantic Validation
2. Error Handling
3. Test Updates
4. Documentation Updates
5. fix bug: #5915
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Documentation Update
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
change create dataset delimiter default value to r'\n'
### Type of change
- [x] New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Remove unnecessary parameter restrictions in dataset creation API
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Deprecate get_dataset_id_and_document_id fixture, use add_document
instead
### Type of change
- [x] Update test cases
### What problem does this PR solve?
This PR introduces Pydantic-based validation for the create dataset HTTP
API, improving code clarity and robustness. Key changes include:
1. Pydantic Validation
2. Error Handling
3. Test Updates
4. Documentation
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] Documentation Update
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
The knowledge_graph chunk method is deprecated and should no longer be
used. #7184.
### Type of change
- [x] Refactoring
### What problem does this PR solve?
Fix retrieval testing wrong pagination. #7171
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Co-authored-by: Kevin Hu <kevinhu.sh@gmail.com>
…gic to return the correct deletion message. Add handling for empty
arrays to ensure no errors occur during the deletion operation. Update
the test cases to verify the new logic.
### What problem does this PR solve?
fix this bug：https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow/issues/6607
### Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
---------
Co-authored-by: wenju.li <wenju.li@deepctr.cn>
### What problem does this PR solve?
_Briefly describe what this PR aims to solve. Include background context
that will help reviewers understand the purpose of the PR._
### Type of change
- [x] add test cases
### What problem does this PR solve?
_Briefly describe what this PR aims to solve. Include background context
that will help reviewers understand the purpose of the PR._
### Type of change
- [x] update test cases
- Fix incorrect progress check condition that prevented re-parsing of
completed documents
- Allow parsing for documents with progress 0.0 (not started) or 1.0
(completed)
- Only block parsing for documents currently in progress (0.0 < progress
< 1.0)
Close#6312
---------
Co-authored-by: Kevin Hu <kevinhu.sh@gmail.com>
