These settings say the same, only the infill_overlap_mm one overwrites the infill_overlap setting. I therefore removed infill_overlap_mm so that the mm gets auto-calculated and none of the settings are overwritten any more (so they don't get greyed out).
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
This was delivered false by the materials team. It seems that in the end they decided to not use gradual infill for PP but only made the change in UM3, not UM2+. Removing gradual infill also requires me to set the infill density to 20% (the default).
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
And then also update the profiles to make the profiles end up at what it was originally (I confirmed this with the materials team).
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
The stand-by temperature should be 175 for these profiles because the UM3 firmware levels the bed with that temperature. It should be 100 in the quality profiles because that's what the stand-by temperature should be when standing by while the other nozzle is printing.
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
The stand-by temperature in the material profiles is the temperature at which the build plate levelling should be done. The actual stand-by temperature in Cura should be 100, so these profiles have to overwrite the material profile then.
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
These profiles have been tested and they are in the process of optimising them, but there is still some room for improvement there so this is supposed to lower the expectations of our users.
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
Note that Git says that Fast was renamed to Verydraft, but in reality Fast was renamed to Draft and Draft was renamed to Verydraft.
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
These are optimised to the level of the materials: Anything that is common between quality profiles with the same material and nozzle gets bubbled to the profile for that material (per nozzle). It doesn't bubble any further (to the variant) because that could have an impact on the other profiles.
This basically only removes settings because where these settings then bubble to is the material profile in the fdm_materials repository. And a lot of settings are just removed because they are equal to the default.
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
They are now supported. This breaks the stacks of people who had these profiles active when they upgraded from 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, which causes them to get a screen of which printer they want to add, and they lose their current settings. But we decided that this use case is too slim to make an entire version upgrade for this patch-version release.
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
This removes all settings that are equal to the defaults. Some settings are 'common' between all profiles of the same material. I've let those settings bubble up to the material profiles but that change is then obviously only apparent in the fdm_materials repository.
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
These profiles are improved by the materials team. This is directly copied from them and should now be optimised for our use.
Contributes to issue CURA-3960.
Now that users have gradual infill available as option in recommended mode, it was deemed better to let the user choose when he wants it. I left the step height intact, in case the user chooses it anyway.
If it's less, the layer doesn't get properly filled, according to the materials team. They requested that the thickness should be set to 0.225mm for just the Fine and Extra Fine profiles, but I opted for a formula that would still let it scale with the layer height up to a point.
For the 0.8mm profiles the variants specify 5%, so we remove it from those profiles. The 0.4mm variants specify 15% so for those we need to override it.
The UM3 definition sets the setting to 3mm. Nothing else sets it to another value except FDM Printer. I left the UM3 setting in and removed all travel_avoid_distance settings in the UM3 profiles.
