Can now specify that the z-seam should be located in either the most concave region of the
outline, the most convex region or the most curved (concave or convex) region.
This should make it a bit easier for others to create a new definition since there is less for them to 'have to know'. Previously they would be required to fill in as category Other, but now they can just leave the category out.
It now constrains the value to be no less than 0 when z_offset_layer_0 is negative or
z_offset_taper_layers is 0, otherwise the value must be such that the gap between subsequent
layers is not less than 80% of the normal layer height.
If the print head was lowered for the first layer, the tapering will always cause the
subsequent layers to be at least the normal layer height above the previous layer so the
tapering can occur over any number of layers.
On the other hand, if the print head was raised for the first layer, we demand that either
tapering is not used (value is 0) or that the tapering occurs over sufficient layers so that
the inter-layer gaps are not too small.
Now the offset cannot be such that the first layer would be less than 1/2 of its normal height.
Warnings shown when first layer is less than 80% or more than 200% of its normal height.
This definition was provided to me via e-mail. The initial data was badly formatted, so I corrected it and verified back with Michael Wildermuth that the new profile worked. Apparently it works, so thank you Michael.
This was discussed with the materials team. A layer height of 0.4mm for a 0.4mm nozzle could give problems. This would be even worse with a 0.25mm nozzle.
CURA-4145
- Remove "wall_extruder_nr"
- Remove all "limit_to_extruder" for all parent wall settings
- Change settings that used to depend on the wall extruder to get
value from the inner wall extruder
This could be dependent on either the inner or the outer wall, depending on how many walls you have. However usually it will be the inner wall.
Contributes to issue CURA-4145.
The material profiles are sent to UM3 with a manufacturer that's obtained from the printer definition rather than the material definition. The printer definition was 'Ultimaker' rather than 'Ultimaker B.V.' and the printer checked against this.
Contributes to issue CURA-4159.
