This commit is contained in:
supermerill 2019-03-14 18:43:51 +01:00
parent 3c297435a3
commit a4a1d287c3

View File

@ -1714,10 +1714,10 @@ void PrintConfigDef::init_fff_params()
def = this->add("no_perimeter_unsupported_algo", coEnum);
def->label = L("No perimeters on bridge areas");
def->tooltip = L("Experimental option to remove perimeters where there is nothing under it and where a bridged infill should be better. "
"\n * Remove perimeters: remove the unsupported periemter, let the bridge area as-is."
"\n * Keep only bridges: remove the unsupported periemter, kep only bridges that end in solid area."
"\n * Keep bridges and overhangs: remove the unsupported periemter, keep only bridges that end in solid area, fill the rest with overhang perimeters+bridges."
"\n * Fill the voids with bridges: remove the unsupported periemter, draw bridges over the whole hole. !! can lead to problems with overhangs shape like /\\, consider carefully before using this option!"
"\n * Remove perimeters: remove the unsupported perimeter, let the bridge area as-is."
"\n * Keep only bridges: remove the unsupported perimeter, kep only bridges that end in solid area."
"\n * Keep bridges and overhangs: remove the unsupported perimeter, keep only bridges that end in solid area, fill the rest with overhang perimeters+bridges."
"\n * Fill the voids with bridges: remove the unsupported perimeter, draw bridges over the whole hole. !! can lead to problems with overhangs shape like /\\, consider carefully before using this option!"
"\n!!Computationally intensive!!. ");
def->cli = "no-perimeter-unsupported-algo=s";
def->enum_keys_map = &ConfigOptionEnum<NoPerimeterUnsupportedAlgo>::get_enum_values();