remove largeEps in adjoint unit test and use a more accurate test_isApproxWithRef test.

This commit is contained in:
Gael Guennebaud 2011-02-18 17:39:04 +01:00
parent 8f8c67b8bd
commit 86ca05b324
2 changed files with 22 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -40,10 +40,6 @@ template<typename MatrixType> void adjoint(const MatrixType& m)
Index rows = m.rows();
Index cols = m.cols();
RealScalar largerEps = test_precision<RealScalar>();
if (internal::is_same<RealScalar,float>::value)
largerEps = RealScalar(1e-3f);
MatrixType m1 = MatrixType::Random(rows, cols),
m2 = MatrixType::Random(rows, cols),
m3(rows, cols),
@ -68,8 +64,10 @@ template<typename MatrixType> void adjoint(const MatrixType& m)
// check basic properties of dot, norm, norm2
typedef typename NumTraits<Scalar>::Real RealScalar;
VERIFY(internal::isApprox((s1 * v1 + s2 * v2).dot(v3), internal::conj(s1) * v1.dot(v3) + internal::conj(s2) * v2.dot(v3), largerEps));
VERIFY(internal::isApprox(v3.dot(s1 * v1 + s2 * v2), s1*v3.dot(v1)+s2*v3.dot(v2), largerEps));
RealScalar ref = NumTraits<Scalar>::IsInteger ? 0 : std::max((s1 * v1 + s2 * v2).norm(),v3.norm());
VERIFY(test_isApproxWithRef((s1 * v1 + s2 * v2).dot(v3), internal::conj(s1) * v1.dot(v3) + internal::conj(s2) * v2.dot(v3), ref));
VERIFY(test_isApproxWithRef(v3.dot(s1 * v1 + s2 * v2), s1*v3.dot(v1)+s2*v3.dot(v2), ref));
VERIFY_IS_APPROX(internal::conj(v1.dot(v2)), v2.dot(v1));
VERIFY_IS_APPROX(internal::real(v1.dot(v1)), v1.squaredNorm());
if(!NumTraits<Scalar>::IsInteger)
@ -77,7 +75,9 @@ template<typename MatrixType> void adjoint(const MatrixType& m)
VERIFY_IS_MUCH_SMALLER_THAN(internal::abs(vzero.dot(v1)), static_cast<RealScalar>(1));
// check compatibility of dot and adjoint
VERIFY(internal::isApprox(v1.dot(square * v2), (square.adjoint() * v1).dot(v2), largerEps));
ref = NumTraits<Scalar>::IsInteger ? 0 : std::max(std::max(v1.norm(),v2.norm()),std::max((square * v2).norm(),(square.adjoint() * v1).norm()));
VERIFY(test_isApproxWithRef(v1.dot(square * v2), (square.adjoint() * v1).dot(v2), ref));
// like in testBasicStuff, test operator() to check const-qualification
Index r = internal::random<Index>(0, rows-1),
@ -119,9 +119,9 @@ void test_adjoint()
CALL_SUBTEST_1( adjoint(Matrix<float, 1, 1>()) );
CALL_SUBTEST_2( adjoint(Matrix3d()) );
CALL_SUBTEST_3( adjoint(Matrix4f()) );
CALL_SUBTEST_4( adjoint(MatrixXcf(4, 4)) );
CALL_SUBTEST_5( adjoint(MatrixXi(8, 12)) );
CALL_SUBTEST_6( adjoint(MatrixXf(21, 21)) );
CALL_SUBTEST_4( adjoint(MatrixXcf(internal::random<int>(1,50), internal::random<int>(1,50))) );
CALL_SUBTEST_5( adjoint(MatrixXi(internal::random<int>(1,50), internal::random<int>(1,50))) );
CALL_SUBTEST_6( adjoint(MatrixXf(internal::random<int>(1,50), internal::random<int>(1,50))) );
}
// test a large matrix only once
CALL_SUBTEST_7( adjoint(Matrix<float, 100, 100>()) );

View File

@ -346,6 +346,18 @@ inline bool test_isApprox(const Type1& a, const Type2& b)
return a.isApprox(b, test_precision<typename Type1::Scalar>());
}
// The idea behind this function is to compare the two scalars a and b where
// the scalar ref is a hint about the expected order of magnitude of a and b.
// Therefore, if for some reason a and b are very small compared to ref,
// we won't issue a false negative.
// This test could be: abs(a-b) <= eps * ref
// However, it seems that simply comparing a+ref and b+ref is more sensitive to true error.
template<typename Scalar,typename ScalarRef>
inline bool test_isApproxWithRef(const Scalar& a, const Scalar& b, const ScalarRef& ref)
{
return test_isApprox(a+ref, b+ref);
}
template<typename Derived1, typename Derived2>
inline bool test_isMuchSmallerThan(const MatrixBase<Derived1>& m1,
const MatrixBase<Derived2>& m2)