The evalautor of Solve was missing the EvalBeforeNestingBit flag.

This commit is contained in:
Gael Guennebaud 2015-10-09 14:57:19 +02:00
parent 515ecddb97
commit ae38910693
2 changed files with 23 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ struct evaluator<Solve<Decomposition,RhsType> >
typedef Solve<Decomposition,RhsType> SolveType;
typedef typename SolveType::PlainObject PlainObject;
typedef evaluator<PlainObject> Base;
enum { Flags = Base::Flags | EvalBeforeNestingBit };
EIGEN_DEVICE_FUNC explicit evaluator(const SolveType& solve)
: m_result(solve.rows(), solve.cols())

View File

@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ template <typename MatrixType> void run_nesting_ops_1(const MatrixType& _m)
template <typename MatrixType> void run_nesting_ops_2(const MatrixType& _m)
{
typedef typename MatrixType::Scalar Scalar;
Index rows = _m.rows();
Index cols = _m.cols();
MatrixType m1 = MatrixType::Random(rows,cols);
@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ template <typename MatrixType> void run_nesting_ops_2(const MatrixType& _m)
{
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<10>(m1), 0 );
if(!NumTraits<typename MatrixType::Scalar>::IsComplex)
if(!NumTraits<Scalar>::IsComplex)
{
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<3>(2*m1), 0 );
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<4>(2*m1), 1 );
@ -69,11 +70,21 @@ template <typename MatrixType> void run_nesting_ops_2(const MatrixType& _m)
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<3>(m1+m1), 1 );
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<1>(m1*m1.transpose()), 1 );
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<2>(m1*m1.transpose()), 1 );
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<1>(m1 + m1*m1), 2 ); // FIXME should already be 1 thanks the already existing rule
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<10>(m1 + m1*m1), 2 );
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<1>(m1.template triangularView<Lower>().solve(m1.col(0))), 1 );
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<10>(m1.template triangularView<Lower>().solve(m1.col(0))), 1 );
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<1>(Scalar(2)*m1.template triangularView<Lower>().solve(m1.col(0))), 2 ); // FIXME could be one by applying the scaling in-place on the solve result
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<1>(m1.col(0)+m1.template triangularView<Lower>().solve(m1.col(0))), 2 ); // FIXME could be one by adding m1.col() inplace
VERIFY_EVALUATION_COUNT( use_n_times<10>(m1.col(0)+m1.template triangularView<Lower>().solve(m1.col(0))), 2 );
}
{
VERIFY( verify_eval_type<10>(m1, m1) );
if(!NumTraits<typename MatrixType::Scalar>::IsComplex)
if(!NumTraits<Scalar>::IsComplex)
{
VERIFY( verify_eval_type<3>(2*m1, 2*m1) );
VERIFY( verify_eval_type<4>(2*m1, m1) );
@ -88,6 +99,10 @@ template <typename MatrixType> void run_nesting_ops_2(const MatrixType& _m)
VERIFY( verify_eval_type<1>(m1*m1.transpose(), m1) );
VERIFY( verify_eval_type<1>(m1*(m1+m1).transpose(), m1) );
VERIFY( verify_eval_type<2>(m1*m1.transpose(), m1) );
VERIFY( verify_eval_type<1>(m1+m1*m1, m1) );
VERIFY( verify_eval_type<1>(m1.template triangularView<Lower>().solve(m1), m1) );
VERIFY( verify_eval_type<1>(m1+m1.template triangularView<Lower>().solve(m1), m1) );
}
}
@ -99,9 +114,10 @@ void test_nesting_ops()
CALL_SUBTEST_3(run_nesting_ops_1(Matrix4f::Random()));
CALL_SUBTEST_4(run_nesting_ops_1(Matrix2d::Random()));
CALL_SUBTEST_1( run_nesting_ops_2(MatrixXf(internal::random<int>(1,EIGEN_TEST_MAX_SIZE), internal::random<int>(1,EIGEN_TEST_MAX_SIZE))) );
CALL_SUBTEST_2( run_nesting_ops_2(MatrixXcd(internal::random<int>(1,EIGEN_TEST_MAX_SIZE), internal::random<int>(1,EIGEN_TEST_MAX_SIZE))) );
Index s = internal::random<int>(1,EIGEN_TEST_MAX_SIZE);
CALL_SUBTEST_1( run_nesting_ops_2(MatrixXf(s,s)) );
CALL_SUBTEST_2( run_nesting_ops_2(MatrixXcd(s,s)) );
CALL_SUBTEST_3( run_nesting_ops_2(Matrix4f()) );
CALL_SUBTEST_4( run_nesting_ops_2(Matrix2d()) );
TEST_SET_BUT_UNUSED_VARIABLE(s)
}