The errors were introduced by this commit : d38e6fbc27
After the above mentioned commit, some of the tests started failing with the following error
```
Building HIPCC object unsupported/test/CMakeFiles/cxx11_tensor_reduction_gpu_5.dir/cxx11_tensor_reduction_gpu_5_generated_cxx11_tensor_reduction_gpu.cu.o
In file included from /home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/test/cxx11_tensor_reduction_gpu.cu:16:
In file included from /home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/Tensor:29:
In file included from /home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/../SpecialFunctions:70:
/home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/../src/SpecialFunctions/SpecialFunctionsHalf.h:28:22: error: call to 'erf' is ambiguous
return Eigen::half(Eigen::numext::erf(static_cast<float>(a)));
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/test/../../Eigen/src/Core/MathFunctions.h:1600:7: note: candidate function [with T = float]
float erf(const float &x) { return ::erff(x); }
^
/home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/../src/SpecialFunctions/SpecialFunctionsImpl.h:1897:5: note: candidate function [with Scalar = float]
erf(const Scalar& x) {
^
In file included from /home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/test/cxx11_tensor_reduction_gpu.cu:16:
In file included from /home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/Tensor:29:
In file included from /home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/../SpecialFunctions:75:
/home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/../src/SpecialFunctions/arch/GPU/GpuSpecialFunctions.h:87:23: error: call to 'erf' is ambiguous
return make_double2(erf(a.x), erf(a.y));
^~~
/home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/test/../../Eigen/src/Core/MathFunctions.h:1603:8: note: candidate function [with T = double]
double erf(const double &x) { return ::erf(x); }
^
/home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/../src/SpecialFunctions/SpecialFunctionsImpl.h:1897:5: note: candidate function [with Scalar = double]
erf(const Scalar& x) {
^
In file included from /home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/test/cxx11_tensor_reduction_gpu.cu:16:
In file included from /home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/Tensor:29:
In file included from /home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/../SpecialFunctions:75:
/home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/../src/SpecialFunctions/arch/GPU/GpuSpecialFunctions.h:87:33: error: call to 'erf' is ambiguous
return make_double2(erf(a.x), erf(a.y));
^~~
/home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/test/../../Eigen/src/Core/MathFunctions.h:1603:8: note: candidate function [with T = double]
double erf(const double &x) { return ::erf(x); }
^
/home/rocm-user/eigen/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/../src/SpecialFunctions/SpecialFunctionsImpl.h:1897:5: note: candidate function [with Scalar = double]
erf(const Scalar& x) {
^
3 errors generated.
```
This PR fixes the compile error by removing the "old" implementation for "erf" (assuming that the "new" implementation is what we want going forward. from a GPU point-of-view both implementations are the same).
This PR also fixes what seems like a cut-n-paste error in the aforementioned commit
- Split SpecialFunctions files in to a separate BesselFunctions file.
In particular add:
- Modified bessel functions of the second kind k0, k1, k0e, k1e
- Bessel functions of the first kind j0, j1
- Bessel functions of the second kind y0, y1
The fixes needed are
* adding EIGEN_DEVICE_FUNC attribute to a couple of funcs (else HIPCC will error out when non-device funcs are called from global/device funcs)
* switching to using ::<math_func> instead std::<math_func> (only for HIPCC) in cases where the std::<math_func> is not recognized as a device func by HIPCC
* removing an errant "j" from a testcase (don't know how that made it in to begin with!)
* Modifying TensorDeviceSYCL to use `EIGEN_THROW_X`.
* Modifying TensorMacro to use `EIGEN_TRY/CATCH(X)` macro.
* Modifying TensorReverse.h to use `EIGEN_DEVICE_REF` instead of `&`.
* Fixing the SYCL device macro in SpecialFunctionsImpl.h.
- cleanup noise in imaginary part of real roots
- take into account the magnitude of the derivative to check roots.
- use <= instead of < at appropriate places
This fixes the static assertion complaining about double being
used in place of long double. This happened on MIPS32, where
double and long double have the same type representation.
This can be simulated on x86 as well if we pass -mlong-double-64
to g++.
