GitHub-Proxy/deer-flow
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.mirrors.martin98.com/https://github.com/bytedance/deer-flow synced 2025-08-20 13:09:11 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
deer-flow/examples/Quantum_Computing_Impact_on_Cryptography.md

14 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Quantum Computing Impact on Cryptography

Key Points

  • Quantum computers threaten classical cryptographic algorithms like RSA and ECC due to Shor's algorithm.
  • AES is vulnerable to Grover's algorithm, albeit to a lesser extent than RSA and ECC. AES-256 is more resistant than AES-128.
  • Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) aims to develop algorithms resistant to quantum computer attacks.
  • Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) offers secure key exchange based on quantum mechanics, but faces practical challenges.
  • NIST is standardizing PQC algorithms, and organizations are exploring hybrid QKD/PQC solutions.
  • The timeline for significant quantum attacks is uncertain, but proactive measures are necessary.

Overview

Quantum computing poses a significant threat to modern cryptography. Quantum algorithms like Shor's and Grover's can break or weaken widely used encryption methods. This necessitates the development and adoption of quantum-resistant cryptographic solutions. This report provides an overview of the impact of quantum computing on existing cryptographic algorithms and explores potential solutions like post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and Quantum Key Distribution (QKD).

Detailed Analysis

Vulnerabilities of Classical Cryptography

Classical cryptographic algorithms rely on mathematical problems that are difficult for classical computers to solve but are vulnerable to quantum algorithms.

Algorithm Vulnerability Quantum Algorithm Impact
RSA Factoring Shor's Algorithm Efficient factorization of large numbers, breaking RSA encryption
ECC Discrete Log Shor's Algorithm Efficiently solves discrete logarithm problems, breaking ECC encryption
AES Brute Force Grover's Algorithm Reduces the search space, weakening AES security; AES-256 is stronger

Shor's algorithm can efficiently factor large numbers, rendering RSA and ECC useless if a sufficiently powerful quantum computer is developed [http://greekcrisis.net/shors-algorithm-quantum-computers/]. Breaking RSA-2048 requires approximately 4000 qubits, and ECC-256 requires about 2500 qubits [https://ej-compute.org/index.php/compute/article/view/146].

Grover's algorithm reduces the brute-force search space for AES, weakening its security [https://ej-compute.org/index.php/compute/article/view/146]. AES-256 is more secure against quantum attacks than AES-128 or AES-192 [https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/6712/is-aes-256-a-post-quantum-secure-cipher-or-not].

Quantum Computational Resources

Breaking RSA-2048 requires around 4000 qubits and millions of gate operations, potentially achievable within the next decade [https://ej-compute.org/index.php/compute/article/view/146]. A quantum computer breaking RSA-2048 in hours could be built by 2030 for around a billion dollars [https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/102671/is-aes-128-quantum-safe]. IBM has a 1121-qubit 'Condor' processor, with leading platforms aiming for two-qubit gate fidelity in the range of 99.9% to 99.99% [https://methodologists.net/Exploring-the-Transformative-Advancements-in-Quantum-Computing-and-Their-Global-Impact-in-2024].

Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)

Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) involves developing cryptographic algorithms that are secure against attacks by both classical and quantum computers [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography].

PQC Algorithm Types

Algorithm Type Examples Characteristics
Lattice-based CRYSTALS-Kyber, CRYSTALS-Dilithium, NTRU Based on the hardness of lattice problems
Multivariate Rainbow Based on the difficulty of solving systems of multivariate polynomial equations
Hash-based SPHINCS+ Based on the security of cryptographic hash functions
Code-based Classic McEliece Based on the difficulty of decoding general linear codes
Isogeny-based CSIDH Based on isogenies between supersingular elliptic curves
Symmetric Key Quantum Resistance AES and SNOW 3G Post quantum resistance to known Symmetric Key Quantum resistance attacks

PQC algorithms often require larger key sizes compared to pre-quantum algorithms [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography].

NIST Standardization

NIST is conducting a Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process to select PQC algorithms [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography]. NIST has released the first three finalized post-quantum encryption standards: CRYSTALS-Kyber (ML-KEM), CRYSTALS-Dilithium (ML-DSA), and SPHINCS+ [https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2024/08/nist-releases-first-3-finalized-post-quantum-encryption-standards].

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD)

QKD offers a method for secure key exchange leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics [https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jce/papers/Vol16-issue2/Version-11/A0162110109.pdf]. Eavesdropping introduces detectable anomalies due to the disturbance of the quantum system [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_key_distribution].

QKD Protocols

Protocol Description
BB84 First QKD protocol
E91 Uses entangled photons
COW Coherent One Way

Practical challenges include secret key rate, distance, size, cost, and practical security [https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05853]. The NSA views quantum-resistant cryptography (PQC) as a more cost-effective and easily maintained solution than QKD for securing data in National Security Systems [https://www.nsa.gov/Cybersecurity/Quantum-Key-Distribution-QKD-and-Quantum-Cryptography-QC/].

Hybrid Approaches

Hybrid security systems integrating PQC and QKD are being explored [https://www.gsma.com/newsroom/wp-content/uploads//IG.18-Hybrid-QKD-and-PQC-security-scenarios-and-use-cases-Whitepaper-v1.0-002.pdf]. Network operators are expected to spend over $6 billion on QKD development and implementation between 2025 and 2030 [https://smartinfrastructuremagazine.com/news/quantum-key-distribution-network-operators-to-spend-6-3-billion-over-next-six-years].

Risk Assessment and Timelines

Quantum computing advancements are progressing, creating an urgent need to transition to quantum-safe alternatives [https://ej-compute.org/index.php/compute/article/view/146]. Cryptographic vulnerabilities may emerge within the next 5–10 years [https://ej-compute.org/index.php/compute/article/view/146].

Key Citations